mirror of
https://github.com/almet/notmyidea.git
synced 2025-04-28 19:42:37 +02:00
228 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
228 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
# Analyse users' browsing context to build up a web recommender
|
||
|
||
|
||
No, this is not an april's fool ;)
|
||
|
||
Wow, it's been a long time. My year in Oxford is going really well. I
|
||
realized few days ago that the end of the year is approaching really
|
||
quickly. Exams are coming in one month or such and then I'll be working
|
||
full time on my dissertation topic.
|
||
|
||
When I learned we'll have about 6 month to work on something, I first
|
||
thought about doing a packaging related stuff, but finally decided to
|
||
start something new. After all, that's the good time to learn.
|
||
|
||
Since a long time, I'm being impressed by the [last.fm](http://last.fm)
|
||
recommender system. They're *scrobbling* the music I listen to since
|
||
something like 5 years now and the recommendations they're doing are
|
||
really nice and accurate (I discovered **a lot** of great artists
|
||
listening to the "neighbour radio".) (by the way, [here
|
||
is](http://lastfm.com/user/akounet/) my lastfm account)
|
||
|
||
So I decided to work on recommender systems, to better understand what
|
||
is it about.
|
||
|
||
Recommender systems are usually used to increase the sales of products
|
||
(like Amazon.com does) which is not really what I'm looking for (The one
|
||
who know me a bit know I'm kind of sick about all this consumerism going
|
||
on).
|
||
|
||
Actually, the most simple thing I thought of was the web: I'm browsing
|
||
it quite every day and each time new content appears. I've stopped to
|
||
follow [my feed reader](https://bitbucket.org/bruno/aspirator/) because
|
||
of the information overload, and reduced drastically the number of
|
||
people I follow [on twitter](http://twitter.com/ametaireau/).
|
||
|
||
Too much information kills the information.
|
||
|
||
You shall got what will be my dissertation topic: a recommender system
|
||
for the web. Well, such recommender systems already exists, so I will
|
||
try to add contextual information to them: you're probably not
|
||
interested by the same topics at different times of the day, or
|
||
depending on the computer you're using. We can also probably make good
|
||
use of the way you browse to create groups into the content you're
|
||
browsing (or even use the great firefox4 tab group feature).
|
||
|
||
There is a large part of concerns to have about user's privacy as well.
|
||
|
||
Here is my proposal (copy/pasted from the one I had to do for my master)
|
||
|
||
## Introduction and rationale
|
||
|
||
Nowadays, people surf the web more and more often. New web pages are
|
||
created each day so the amount of information to retrieve is more
|
||
important as the time passes. These users uses the web in different
|
||
contexts, from finding cooking recipes to technical articles.
|
||
|
||
A lot of people share the same interest to various topics, and the
|
||
quantity of information is such than it's really hard to triage them
|
||
efficiently without spending hours doing it. Firstly because of the huge
|
||
quantity of information but also because the triage is something
|
||
relative to each person. Although, this triage can be facilitated by
|
||
fetching the browsing information of all particular individuals and put
|
||
the in perspective.
|
||
|
||
Machine learning is a branch of Artificial Intelligence (AI) which deals
|
||
with how a program can learn from data. Recommendation systems are a
|
||
particular application area of machine learning which is able to
|
||
recommend things (links in our case) to the users, given a particular
|
||
database containing the previous choices users have made.
|
||
|
||
This browsing information is currently available in browsers. Even if it
|
||
is not in a very usable format, it is possible to transform it to
|
||
something useful. This information gold mine just wait to be used.
|
||
Although, it is not as simple as it can seems at the first approach: It
|
||
is important to take care of the context the user is in while browsing
|
||
links. For instance, It's more likely that during the day, a computer
|
||
scientist will browse computing related links, and that during the
|
||
evening, he browse cooking recipes or something else.
|
||
|
||
Page contents are also interesting to analyse, because that's what
|
||
people browse and what actually contain the most interesting part of the
|
||
information. The raw data extracted from the browsing can then be
|
||
translated into something more useful (namely tags, type of resource,
|
||
visit frequency, navigation context etc.)
|
||
|
||
The goal of this dissertation is to create a recommender system for web
|
||
links, including this context information.
|
||
|
||
At the end of the dissertation, different pieces of software will be
|
||
provided, from raw data collection from the browser to a recommendation
|
||
system.
|
||
|
||
## Background Review
|
||
|
||
This dissertation is mainly about data extraction, analysis and
|
||
recommendation systems. Two different research area can be isolated:
|
||
Data preprocessing and Information filtering.
|
||
|
||
The first step in order to make recommendations is to gather some data.
|
||
The more data we have available, the better it is (T. Segaran, 2007).
|
||
This data can be retrieved in various ways, one of them is to get it
|
||
directly from user's browsers.
|
||
|
||
### Data preparation and extraction
|
||
|
||
The data gathered from browsers is basically URLs and additional
|
||
information about the context of the navigation. There is clearly a need
|
||
to extract more information about the meaning of the data the user is
|
||
browsing, starting by the content of the web pages.
|
||
|
||
Because the information provided on the current Web is not meant to be
|
||
read by machines (T. Berners Lee, 2001) there is a need of tools to
|
||
extract meaning from web pages. The information needs to be preprocessed
|
||
before stored in a machine readable format, allowing to make
|
||
recommendations (Choochart et Al, 2004).
|
||
|
||
Data preparation is composed of two steps: cleaning and structuring (
|
||
Castellano et Al, 2007). Because raw data can contain a lot of un-needed
|
||
text (such as menus, headers etc.) and need to be cleaned prior to be
|
||
stored. Multiple techniques can be used here and belongs to boilerplate
|
||
removal and full text extraction (Kohlschütter et Al, 2010).
|
||
|
||
Then, structuring the information: category, type of content (news,
|
||
blog, wiki) can be extracted from raw data. This kind of information is
|
||
not clearly defined by HTML pages so there is a need of tools to
|
||
recognise them.
|
||
|
||
Some context-related information can also be inferred from each
|
||
resource. It can go from the visit frequency to the navigation group the
|
||
user was in while browsing. It is also possible to determine if the user
|
||
"liked" a resource, and determine a mark for it, which can be used by
|
||
information filtering a later step (T. Segaran, 2007).
|
||
|
||
At this stage, structuring the data is required. Storing this kind of
|
||
information in RDBMS can be a bit tedious and require complex queries to
|
||
get back the data in an usable format. Graph databases can play a major
|
||
role in the simplification of information storage and querying.
|
||
|
||
### Information filtering
|
||
|
||
To filter the information, three techniques can be used (Balabanovic et
|
||
Al, 1997):
|
||
|
||
- The content-based approach states that if an user have liked
|
||
something in the past, he is more likely to like similar things in
|
||
the future. So it's about establishing a profile for the user and
|
||
compare new items against it.
|
||
- The collaborative approach will rather recommend items that other
|
||
similar users have liked. This approach consider only the
|
||
relationship between users, and not the profile of the user we are
|
||
making recommendations to.
|
||
- the hybrid approach, which appeared recently combine both of the
|
||
previous approaches, giving recommendations when items score high
|
||
regarding user's profile, or if a similar user already liked it.
|
||
|
||
Grouping is also something to consider at this stage (G. Myatt, 2007).
|
||
Because we are dealing with huge amount of data, it can be useful to
|
||
detect group of data that can fit together. Data clustering is able to
|
||
find such groups (T. Segaran, 2007).
|
||
|
||
References:
|
||
|
||
- Balabanović, M., & Shoham, Y. (1997). Fab: content-based,
|
||
collaborative recommendation. Communications of the ACM, 40(3),
|
||
66–72. ACM. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from
|
||
<http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=245108.245124&>;.
|
||
- Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic
|
||
web: Scientific american. Scientific American, 284(5), 34–43.
|
||
Retrieved November 21, 2010, from
|
||
<http://www.citeulike.org/group/222/article/1176986>.
|
||
- Castellano, G., Fanelli, A., & Torsello, M. (2007). LODAP: a LOg
|
||
DAta Preprocessor for mining Web browsing patterns. Proceedings of
|
||
the 6th Conference on 6th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Artificial
|
||
Intelligence, Knowledge Engineering and Data Bases-Volume 6 (p.
|
||
12–17). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society
|
||
(WSEAS). Retrieved March 8, 2011, from
|
||
<http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1348485.1348488>.
|
||
- Kohlschutter, C., Fankhauser, P., & Nejdl, W. (2010). Boilerplate
|
||
detection using shallow text features. Proceedings of the third ACM
|
||
international conference on Web search and data mining (p. 441–450).
|
||
ACM. Retrieved March 8, 2011, from
|
||
<http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1718542>.
|
||
- Myatt, G. J. (2007). Making Sense of Data: A Practical Guide to
|
||
Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Mining.
|
||
- Segaran, T. (2007). Collective Intelligence.
|
||
|
||
## Privacy
|
||
|
||
The first thing that's come to people minds when it comes to process
|
||
their browsing data is privacy. People don't want to be stalked. That's
|
||
perfectly right, and I don't either.
|
||
|
||
But such a system don't have to deal with people identities. It's
|
||
completely possible to process completely anonymous data, and that's
|
||
probably what I'm gonna do.
|
||
|
||
By the way, if you have interesting thoughts about that, if you do know
|
||
projects that do seems related, fire the comments \!
|
||
|
||
## What's the plan ?
|
||
|
||
There is a lot of different things to explore, especially because I'm a
|
||
complete novice in that field.
|
||
|
||
- I want to develop a firefox plugin, to extract the browsing
|
||
informations ( still, I need to know exactly which kind of
|
||
informations to retrieve). The idea is to provide some *raw*
|
||
browsing data, and then to transform it and to store it in the
|
||
better possible way.
|
||
- Analyse how to store the informations in a graph database. What can
|
||
be the different methods to store this data and to visualize the
|
||
relationship between different pieces of data? How can I define the
|
||
different contexts, and add those informations in the db?
|
||
- Process the data using well known recommendation algorithms. Compare
|
||
the results and criticize their value.
|
||
|
||
There is plenty of stuff I want to try during this experimentation:
|
||
|
||
- I want to try using Geshi to visualize the connexion between the
|
||
links, and the contexts
|
||
- Try using graph databases such as Neo4j
|
||
- Having a deeper look at tools such as scikit.learn (a machine
|
||
learning toolkit in python)
|
||
- Analyse web pages in order to categorize them. Processing their
|
||
contents as well, to do some keyword based classification will be
|
||
done.
|
||
|
||
Lot of work on its way, yay \!
|